<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Optimization, Google Optimization - Website Site SEO blog &#187; Page rank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.websiteseoblog.com/Section/page-rank/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 13:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Check your Google Pagerank in each Datacenter</title>
		<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/check-your-google-pagerank-in-each-datacenter.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/check-your-google-pagerank-in-each-datacenter.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weblog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/check-your-google-pagerank-in-each-datacenter.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Datacenters The reason for this dancing is the fact that Google has more than 10,000 servers to catch up with several datacenters. This way separate the risk of going all the way down and can separate the traffic for server load balancing. Obviously, the index update can not proceed on all those servers at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Datacenters The reason for this dancing is the fact that Google has more than 10,000 servers to catch up with several datacenters. This way separate the risk of going all the way down and can separate the traffic for server load balancing. Obviously, the index update can not proceed on all those servers at the same time. One after the other server is updated with the new index.<span id="more-597"></span> Another advantage of this approach is the delay of the power of Google as easily in the previous rate when the new index is to contain errors. Google just have to turn off the guilty datacenter datacenters while others take over. The correction is the process of updating the data center and turn again.  PageRank Checking each individual data center you can see what your PageRank at the end of the whole process. To find out what you your PageRank in different datacenters need to know your IP-address. We have the addresses of all operational datacenters and experimental data centers. As the new index techniques are tested in the experimental data centers want to know your PageRank in these data centers as well. This way you can still have time to look forward to the new techniques of the index.  Datacenter Analyzer Webmasteslookup.com added a new tool to its Web site: Datacenter Analyzer. You can complete your web site&#8217;s URL and the analyzer will tell you the PageRank Datacenter in all known datacenters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/check-your-google-pagerank-in-each-datacenter.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if Google ceased to display the PageRank?</title>
		<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/what-if-google-ceased-to-display-the-pagerank.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/what-if-google-ceased-to-display-the-pagerank.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toolbar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websiteseoblog.com/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every 3 months or so, Google updates the public value of the PageRank of all web pages you have indexed, and with this update comes the concern of thousands of webmasters who regard this as very important value in getting a good position .
In this thread on the forum &#8216;WebmasterWorld&#8217; will debate the possibility that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Every 3 months or so, Google updates the public value of the PageRank of all web pages you have indexed, and with this update comes the concern of thousands of webmasters who regard this as very important value in getting a good position .<span id="more-595"></span></p>
<p>In this thread on the forum &#8216;WebmasterWorld&#8217; will debate the possibility that Google cease to show the public value, which occurs exclusively through the popular Toolbar (and data servers that are consulted by the bar).</p>
<p>Possible pros (Community) will reduce massive spam that is received by webmasters who want to be linked from a web page with a certain PageRank, ended with the obsession of many websites responsible for the value PageRank positioning as the only factor &#8230;</p>
<p>Possible points against (for webmasters) could not detect the problems that we discovered when the bar is white or gray green, you could not tell if we&#8217;re linking to a website with relevant within the WWW &#8230;</p>
<p>Possible points against (for Google): Many users who use the Toolbar PageRank only know (most of the webmasters) would cease to use the tool (with the enormous interest that has Google in that it does not happen), Google would to enjoy these days in that part of the blogosphere about his PageRank (so that means free advertising) &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/what-if-google-ceased-to-display-the-pagerank.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where to measure the PageRank of your website or blog?</title>
		<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/where-to-measure-the-pagerank-of-your-website-or-blog.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/where-to-measure-the-pagerank-of-your-website-or-blog.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[-Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pagerank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websiteseoblog.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost everywhere on the internet we read that the PageRank is an important indicator of performance or importance of your website or blog on the Internet, so it is good to know where we can measure the ranking.
The pagerank given a value between 0 and 10 of the importance of your website or blog based [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Almost everywhere on the internet we read that the PageRank is an important indicator of performance or importance of your website or blog on the Internet, so it is good to know where we can measure the ranking.<span id="more-565"></span></p>
<p>The pagerank given a value between 0 and 10 of the importance of your website or blog based on an algorithm created by the creators of google the last century.</p>
<p>There are many controversies about the usefulness and accuracy of pagerank, we are not going to enter into a discussion on this subject, but maybe in the future is good touch, but we will give a list of places where we can measure and compare pagerank to have an average .</p>
<p>If you do a google search of the term &#8220;pagerank checker some sites that we will have tools to measure our pagerank, see the first five on the list:</p>
<p>1. &#8211; Pagerankchecker.info: This page of our blog pagerank.</p>
<p>2. &#8211; Iwebtool.com: This page of our blog pagerank.</p>
<p>3. &#8211; Puntogeek.com: This page of our blog pagerank.</p>
<p>4. &#8211; Blogflux.com: This page of our blog pagerank.</p>
<p>5. &#8211; Digpagerank.com: This page of our blog pagerank.</p>
<p>I personally prefer to use sites that offer the pagerank searched in several datacenters, for example puntogeek.com has an interesting list of active datacenters.</p>
<p>Do you know what the pagerank of your website or blog, and you know what that means for the same? Go ahead and discuss it and expose your point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/29/where-to-measure-the-pagerank-of-your-website-or-blog.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New PageRank Update</title>
		<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/08/new-pagerank-update.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/08/new-pagerank-update.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websiteseoblog.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As has been happening every 4 months or so, Google PageRank export began to make it visible in the Toolbar, confirmed by Matt Cutts from your blog .
The PageRank is always a controversial issue. Many webmasters claim their little value to the Google search results &#8211; which is quite true &#8211; but in recent times [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been happening every 4 months or so, Google PageRank export began to make it visible in the Toolbar, confirmed by Matt Cutts from your blog .</p>
<p>The PageRank is always a controversial issue. Many webmasters claim their little value to the Google search results &#8211; which is quite true &#8211; but in recent times I think we should change the interpretation of PageRank other immediate consequences. <span id="more-411"></span></p>
<p>Why is it important to get a good PageRank?<br />
A high number of PageRank creates certain &#8220;prestige&#8221; especially in regard to blogs. Many people today evaluate the reliability of what is read taking into account the PageRank &#8211; which should not be so, but sometimes it is.<br />
High levels of PageRank improves the amount of money to get advertising on some systems. For example, Text Link Ads (af) algorithm bases its valuation on &#8211; inter alia &#8211; the level of PageRank, so a high level means to generate higher incomes and greater opportunities to generate it because everyone is looking to get links from blogs with PR high.<br />
Creates a high PageRank value added in the blog. If in the future you decide to sell the blog, probably the influence PageRank much as the content or the traffic you&#8217;ve generated, and that having a high PageRank possible exploitation by the buyer are much higher &#8211; spreading links to elsewhere, taking advantage of the aforementioned &#8220;prestige&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p>PageRank indicator is no longer something only on the traffic that comes from Google, for the simple reason that Google changed its strategy to update the SERPs making the readjustment of results is carried out every 1-2 days, so PageRank itself for searches would have a kind of internal dynamism that would not correspond to public value.</p>
<p>If you want to know the PageRank value they will get in this update, there are endless tools, but now I stay with that Dirson . Ojo! the results displayed in the image in an example, will not believe they have PR 9 (but if you come to have, congratulations)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/04/08/new-pagerank-update.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief explanation of Page Rank Google</title>
		<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/14/a-brief-explanation-of-page-rank-google.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/14/a-brief-explanation-of-page-rank-google.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief explanation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page Rank Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/14/a-brief-explanation-of-page-rank-google.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Page Rank (PR) from Google is basically the result set of a formula (algorithm) developed by Larry Page and Sergey Brin at Stanford University and controlling the links that point to a website, their relationship between themselves and the relevance of these on the Internet. That is, the more links from other pages pointing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Page Rank (PR) from Google is basically the result set of a formula (algorithm) developed by Larry Page and Sergey Brin at Stanford University and controlling the links that point to a website, their relationship between themselves and the relevance of these on the Internet. That is, the more links from other pages pointing to our web<span id="more-320"></span> site better, but more importantly is that these are quality links, pages with a certain reputation and prestige within the network, and having a related theme.</p>
<p>Currently, there are many pages that try to get links to all costs, hence the proliferation of trade links, and often not taken into account that in the massive exchange programs link the quality of them is very low, even able to be penalized by Google if it detects it.</p>
<p>So, what is important to achieve a higher Page Rank for a website is getting related links pointing to it and are of quality.</p>
<p>It is also interesting that the Google Page Rank is not everything in reference to a web positioning in search engines. Does not even have direct and infallible with the quality of it is simply a reference for Google to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/14/a-brief-explanation-of-page-rank-google.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter and PageRank</title>
		<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/12/twitter-and-pagerank.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/12/twitter-and-pagerank.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank as Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/12/twitter-and-pagerank.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Seo Women I find a video made by Matt Cutts, who responded to a question about the importance of PageRank in the Twitter profiles.
One user noted that different profiles (with few followers and a few comments) are PageRank 4, while other profiles do not have PR. 
And what does Matt Cutts on the subject? Basically, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via Seo Women I find a video made by Matt Cutts, who responded to a question about the importance of PageRank in the Twitter profiles.</p>
<p>One user noted that different profiles (with few followers and a few comments) are PageRank 4, while other profiles do not have PR. <span id="more-266"></span></p>
<p>And what does Matt Cutts on the subject? Basically, the PageRank is one of 200 factors that Google takes into account to build his ranking of results.</p>
<p>But there is no worry about PageRank as Twitter has no-follow on your links, meaning that in principle would transfer PageRank.</p>
<p>But it may be that these Twitter profiles that have a high PageRank sites are linked by authorities or receiving many links.</p>
<p>But Cutts also points out that what is valued (or important) a Twitter account, it&#8217;s people, in conversation. Therefore, we should not worry so much about the PR and if:<br />
comment,<br />
respond to other users,<br />
see the answers we generate back (reciprocity) and<br />
share good links</p>
<p>This is, broadly speaking, we can extract the video. Or at least to me it seemed more relevant. What do you think of the article? Do you care about the PageRank of your Twitter accounts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2010/03/12/twitter-and-pagerank.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New market share data shows the key to site optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2008/01/09/new-market-share-data-shows-the-key-to-site-optimization.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2008/01/09/new-market-share-data-shows-the-key-to-site-optimization.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websiteseoblog.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search engine optimization has been very popular over the last few years, as more and more companies grow aware of the rules governing the Internet market and realize that they need to be noticed on the World Wide Web in order to survive. This is especially valid for one of Europeâ€™s leading Internet markets, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search engine optimization has been very popular over the last few years, as more and more companies grow aware of the rules governing the Internet market and realize that they need to be noticed on the World Wide Web in order to survive. This is especially valid for one of Europeâ€™s leading Internet markets, the United Kingdom, where the number of web-based businesses is constantly on the rise, the demands of online customers grow, and competition is fierce. In November 2007, the SEO provider myclicks published website market share rankings of web traffic in the UK. The statistics is based on UK Internet usage, ranked by volume of searches for the four weeks ending on November 30, 2007. The group with the biggest market share is that of search engines, followed by social media sites.<br />
<span id="more-15"></span><br />
Among search engines, google uk and google together account for 85% of all search engine usage, followed by ask dot com (4%) and yahoo uk (3%). While Google is the unquestioned leader, traditional websites such as yahoo and MSN are falling behind. The reason for this downward trend is that while still using these portals for news and various other things, Internet users now prefer specialized search engines in order to get reliable information and sources. MSN is currently suffering from insufficient impressions and is trying to expand its network. However, the process is very time-consuming and has so far failed to produce favourable results.</p>
<p>The second largest holder of market share according to the survey of myclicks.us is the group of social media sites, which in the UK account for 4,5% of all web traffic. Facebook dot com, Bebo dot com, and Myspace dot com are the biggest players in the UK in this sector, and along with smaller websites are quickly gaining wide popularity. This makes them a very favourable advertising medium. A good example is Microsoftâ€™s deal for part of Facebook dot com, which with its 2% market share in the UK is the leader among UK social media sites. The purchase gave the software giant the opportunity to advertise in the quickly growing network.</p>
<p>The quick development of social media networks has overtaken that of large online stores and web-based e-mail clients, each of which accounts for 4% of UKâ€™s total website traffic. Although they are traditionally low in the chart, traditional news sites like bbc (co.uk) still manage to hold around 2% of all website traffic in the country.</p>
<p>The survey highlights several main trends in user tastes and preferences. The undoubted new phenomenon is social media sites, which for a very short time have managed to overcome some traditional websites, such as online stores and news sites. Another trend is the emergence of clear favorites on the search engine arena. These findings are essential and useful to all types of businesses and especially to web-based ones, which rely solely on SEO approaches to gain popularity and attract customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websiteseoblog.com/2008/01/09/new-market-share-data-shows-the-key-to-site-optimization.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
