seo agency
A few months ago I spend a consultant of an agency to keep an eye him. A lot of ppt and word. Very general recommendations, although I must admit that I had never seen a consultancy seo as well as models. It was much emphasis on writing to persuade him to write in an appropriate manner, issues of the style set had some meaning but were moderately far from what would be called a hierarchy of styles. Of course proposed mod-rewrite, sitemaps and more.
Very functional all.
But they had not added any point of appropriate categorization, tags, management of historical, News Sitemaps remove 3 links repeated by each news, improve internal linking in a scalable, pr address filtering in some areas, establishing stable structures … not even recommended that the things that are repeated every year, are stable structures. He had taken a template and had filled fields … Of course they also had an oversight to put google analytics, was badly depressed and not on every page.
He ended the relationship with the agency, sent a precious report that talk about the brutal growth, whether that would tell them to grow the data because the codes were getting well and not think that was his curro.
All this leads me to believe that the agencies have not prepared people to be responsible for making the reports, put templates, do not assimilate the content, not thinking how to grow, how to create. Only place the patches do not work in the long run. The agency seo is a template in ppt, a number of areas on which to find and replace, a measurement of software serps, a household name and much nose / Customer Deccan capacity if not growing is not to apply any instead of turning when you indicate that you can follow a path.
I do not say the name because it makes no sense, as I have seen several.